Alternate Access Mapping (AAM)
and Server Name Mapping are two features SharePoint provides to alter the URLs
returned in search results - a common practice used by many companies for their
internal and external users. Both features are available in both the out of the
box search in SharePoint 2010 and in the new FAST Search Server for SharePoint
2010.
This post is intended for people
with working knowledge about the two features who want to know when to use
which. If you need to brush up on your basic understanding about the two
features, here are a couple good sources for your convenience:
• Alternate access mapping:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc261814.aspx
• Server name mapping:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc164184.aspx
Although Server Name Mapping and
Alternate Access Mapping achieve seemingly similar results, they work
independently, addressing different problems, and should not be used together.
I’ve listed the similarity and differences below:
Server Name Mapping
• Is designed for file share and http
content.
• Allows you to map any server name to
anything you like as long as the name you mapped to actually points to the same
set of pages. For example, you might
have a Web site with a real access URL http://foo that you want show as
http://microsoft.com ; or an internal file share server \\foo and you want to
use \\microsoft instead. By setting up Server Name Mapping, your crawler will
use http://foo or \\foo for indexing, but your users will only see
http://microsoft.com, or \\Microsoft .
• Requires a full crawl for the mapping,
once set up, to be applied.
• Search results will always use the new
name for all users.
• Settings overwrite the AAM setting for
the same results, if you use them together - which you shouldn’t.
• Is defined by the search admin for
each SSA (search service application)
Alternate Access Mapping
• Is designed for SharePoint content.
• Allows you to modify results URLs
based on the access URLs for a site. So,
for the same result page, a user
accessing from an internal URL will see results with URLs matching the internal
site, and a user accessing from an
external URL may get the same result set but with URLs matching the external
site. For example, for the same set of SharePoint content, internal users use
http://server to access the site, all the URLs they get in search results are
prefixed with http://server/... ; external users use http://www.microsoft.com,
all the search results they see are prefixed with http://www.microsoft.com.
• Does not require a crawl for the
settings to take effect.
• Generates results URLs based on how
the site is accessed.
• Is set per farm, so if you have more
than 1 search service application in your farm, all of them will use the AAM
setting.
The combination of Search Server
Mapping and Alternate Access Mapping offers a lot of flexibility in managing
URL mappings in search results. I hope this post helps to clarify how these
features work and compare. If you have any questions or observations, please
don’t hesitate to post your comments here.
No comments:
Post a Comment